#1 unlocked: Conclavity 🔓

A lawyer doesn't need an AI that sounds confident. They need one that shows where every line came from.

Conclavity is a legal AI platform for Pakistani law. It drafts, reviews and advises, and every answer points back to the exact document and line it used.

What the video walks through:

1. Ask in plain words, or start from a ready-made task like "Draft a legal agreement".

2. Every reply is tagged with its source, down to the page and line.

3. "Proceed with drafting" turns the conversation into a mutual NDA, built step by step and saved as a version.

4. Download the draft and send it.

5. All the firm's documents sit in one knowledge base, one folder per matter.

The hard part wasn't getting the AI to write. It was making every answer easy to check, so a lawyer can verify the source instead of trusting the output.

We designed the whole product and built the drafting flow.

#2 unlocks next.

Lawyers and legal teams on here: would you trust an AI draft more if it showed you its sources like this?

I've spent years obsessing over the stuff nobody notices on a website. Until it's missing.

AI can now build a whole site in an afternoon. I think that's great.

But it still can't decide what feels right.

I don't think AI is the problem. It just stops at "it works". The last part, the spacing, the type, the way things move when you scroll, still needs someone who cares about it.

That's the part I've always loved doing. So I made a small thing around it: you bring the site AI built, I finish it in Webflow.

It's called Verdikt https://verdikt.studio

Agreed. AI gets you a working layout fast, but spacing and type rhythm are where it still feels off. I'd add forms and mobile checks to that list too. What's the most common fix people bring you?