The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
New manager? A one-on-one can reveal more than a status report.
Try three questions before proposing a fix:
What is taking more effort than I can see from the outside?
Where do you need a decision rather than more advice?
What should I understand before changing how the work is done?
Fictional example: “The handoff keeps arriving late” may point to an unclear owner or a missing approval—not a need to tell someone to work faster. Ask what happens between the handoff steps before deciding what to change.
Keep notes about the work, agree on a useful next step, and avoid promising a change you cannot authorize.
For structured first-month planning and one-on-one preparation, RoleReady’s First-Time Manager workbook is available on Kindle:
amazon.com
Amazon.com: First-Time Manager: Plan Your First 30 Days and Run Better One-on-Ones (RoleReady Career Workbooks) eBook : RoleReady: Kindle Store
First-Time Manager: Plan Your First 30 Days and Run Better One-on-Ones (RoleReady Career Workbooks) - Kindle edition by RoleReady. Download it once and read it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading First-Time Manager: Plan Your First 30 Days and Run Better One-on-Ones (RoleReady Career Workbooks).
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Who is the art director when you are a one person studio?
Me, apparently. I pick the concept, argue with myself about it, change the name three times, and then critique my own logo at midnight.
Working solo means every decision has my fingerprints on it. There is no committee to hide behind and no one to blame. It is slower in some ways and much more honest in others.
If you freelance, how do you give yourself useful feedback?
Myth: once the site is live, the project is done.
Fact: launch is the first day the site meets real visitors. It needs care after that: updates, fixes, content and tracking.
What a monthly check covers on the sites I look after:
• Updates on staging first: core, theme, plugins or apps
• Every form tested end to end. Does the email actually arrive?
• Search Console: new errors, new 404s, pages dropped from the index
• Speed on the top pages, on mobile, not just desktop
Most problems I find in audits weren't there at launch. A plugin update broke a form, a page was renamed without a redirect, a new script slowed the homepage.
None of them are dramatic. They just pile up when nobody looks.
Who checks your site after launch, and how often?
One real site, one real tip, every day. Follow for more videos.
Follow for more videos: instagram.com/sellwrightstudio · youtube.com/@sellwrightstudio
Launch day is when the real data starts, and most owners stop looking right then. What's the first thing you check in the first week after a site goes live?
I’ve been working on a small skill called Manual Orchestrator to make longer projects with AI agents easier to manage.
The problem started with a familiar situation: one chat would accumulate plans, implementation details, corrections, and test results. By the time I was ready for the next phase, I wanted a fresh conversation without losing the decisions we’d already made.
Manual Orchestrator gives that process some structure. One chat acts as the orchestrator: it breaks the work into stages and writes a prompt for the next one. I run that prompt in a new session, then bring the result back. The orchestrator reviews it against the stage’s criteria before preparing the next prompt. If something needs fixing, I go back to the same worker session.
The skill also keeps a record in the project with the current stage, decisions, evidence, and next steps. That makes it easier to pause, resume, or hand the work to another session.
The handoff is manual. I choose when to open a session and carry the result back. The orchestrator and worker sessions can also use different agent CLIs, with the prompt adapted to the capabilities available.
It’s open source and still a work in progress. I’m using it to learn what helps in practice and where the workflow needs to improve. Installation has been checked for Codex, Claude Code, and Gemini CLI, but the full workflow hasn’t been tested across every CLI or version.
If you try it, I’d be interested in hearing what works and where it gets in your way.
