I help companies test their websites and applications, find bugs, and automate their testing usin...I help companies test their websites and applications, find bugs, and automate their testing usin...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
It worked perfectly in the demo.
Then Tuesday happened. 👀
A token expired. A field came in empty. Someone renamed a CRM field.
And nobody noticed for three days.
Here's the truth most people skip:
An automation that runs once isn't reliable. The real test starts after deployment.
These are the things that quietly break good workflows:
⚠️ An API token expires
⚠️ A required field arrives empty
⚠️ A CRM field gets renamed
⚠️ A webhook sends a payload nobody planned for
⚠️ A third-party service goes down for 10 minutes
⚠️ One step fails and leaves two systems out of sync
The scary part is that none of these make noise. They fail silently.
So I don't treat the safety net as an add-on. I build it in from day one:
✅ Validation: Is the data complete before we touch it?
✅ Logging: When something breaks, can we see exactly what happened?
✅ Retries: If it's a temporary hiccup, does the system try again on its own?
✅ Error handling: What happens to the record when step 3 of 5 fails?
✅ Monitoring: How does the team find out, before the client does?
Any automation can save time when everything goes right.
The good ones make failures easy to spot, easy to understand, and easy to recover from.
That's the difference between a workflow that looks great in a demo and one a team can trust every single day.
I'd monitor whether expected records arrived, as well as whether runs failed. A broken webhook can produce no executions at all, so comparing source records with CRM arrivals can catch the silence that an error alert misses.
I have hands-on experience with GHL workflows, automations, pipelines, forms, calendars, lead routing, email/SMS sequences, and integrations. I’ve also worked with Make.com, n8n, APIs, and webhooks to build and troubleshoot automation systems.
I’m comfortable working independently, understanding existing setups, fixing issues, and building workflows based on business needs. I can also overlap with U.S. working hours.
I'm currently available for GoHighLevel (GHL) automation and CRM projects.
I can help with workflows, automations, pipelines, lead nurturing, appointment booking, forms, calendars, and integrations using Make.com, n8n, APIs, and webhooks.
If you need help setting up or improving your GHL system, feel free to reach out. I'd be happy to connect and discuss your project.