Built BugSnap AI: an autonomous QA agent for teams that ship fast without a dedicated QA hire. Yo...Built BugSnap AI: an autonomous QA agent for teams that ship fast without a dedicated QA hire. Yo...
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Built BugSnap AI: an autonomous QA agent for teams that ship fast without a dedicated QA hire.
You point it at your app. It explores like a real user would, clicking, filling forms, navigating, with no pre-written test script. From what it actually finds, it builds test hypotheses on its own, and before it ever reports a bug, it reproduces it independently in a completely fresh session. If it can't reproduce it, it doesn't report it.
Every finding comes with real evidence: the actual steps, real screenshots, not just a confidence score guessing there might be a problem. Once a bug is confirmed fixed, it becomes a permanent regression check so it never quietly comes back.
Plugs into Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues, and Slack, so it fits into however your team already tracks work.
Free tier, no card required, if you want to try it on your own app: bugsnap-ai.com
Weekend fun 😺. The new MacBook Pro has a Dynamic Island, and I kept wondering: what if that little pill was where your AI agent lived?
Try it live: https://lab.behzad.me/agent-mew/
So I spent the weekend prototyping Agent Mew. You drop a file on the notch, give it a task, and it quietly works up there while you keep doing your thing. It shows progress in the wings, asks a quick question when it needs one, and always waits for your OK before doing anything that leaves your Mac, like sending an email.
A few things I explored:
- Progress that stays out of the way, readable at a glance
- Questions as one tap, not a chat window
- Approval cards for anything with real consequences
- Paused and stuck states that tell you what to do next
- A small animated cat, because agents should have some personality
Approval cards for anything that leaves the Mac is the right line to draw. Does the card show the full email before you tap OK, or a short summary? I'd lean toward full text for anything going to another person.
Your Business Doesn't Need More Tools. It Needs Better Systems.
Most businesses don't have a software problem. They have an integration problem.
Their CRM is disconnected from their database. Their spreadsheets require manual updates. Their reports take hours to prepare. Their teams waste valuable time moving information between platforms.
That's where I come in.
I'm a Full-Stack AI Engineer specializing in building connected, intelligent business systems.
What I can build for your business:
CRM & ERP Integrations — Connect business platforms, databases, and third-party services through APIs.
Workflow Automation — Eliminate repetitive processes with intelligent automation.
Custom Dashboards — Turn scattered business data into actionable insights.
Data Pipelines — Build reliable systems for collecting, processing, validating, and synchronizing data.
AI-Powered Solutions — Integrate LLMs, intelligent agents, and automation into existing workflows.
Custom Software — Build complete web applications and business platforms from architecture to deployment.
I've independently developed complex digital platforms, including government-level systems, international applications, and AI-powered products.
My approach is simple:
Understand the business problem. Design the right architecture. Build the complete solution. Make it reliable.
I'm interested in working with founders, agencies, and businesses looking to modernize their operations and build software that actually solves problems.
Have a complex workflow or an integration challenge? Let's build something that works.
When a CRM-to-database sync fails halfway, how do you handle it: idempotent retries, or a reconciliation pass afterward? That's usually where integrations start to drift.
Resolve: an AI support agent that answers from a company’s own policies, looks up orders, and escalates weak matches to a human instead of guessing. A human approves replies before they go out.
For the human approval step, I'd show the exact policy passage and its effective date beside the draft. Does Resolve flag a reply for re-review if the policy changes while it waits for approval?