The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
The Genesis Story: Part 4 ⛓️
Visual creatives need visual solutions. Using a Gemini chat to create and edit art is like trying to paint through a keyhole. By moving the workflow from the chat window into a node graph, the “big picture” is finally visible.
What makes Genesis different?
• BYOK (Bring Your Own Key): Designed to avoid monthly credit caps and expirations. You pay for what you use, directly via Google API.
• Smart Inheritance: Prompts and references flow downstream automatically.
• Identity Lock: Solves the “consistency problem.”
• Style Lock: Avoids uploading multiple references repeatedly.
• The Create Button: Automate the entire workflow.
It’s about reducing the time from “initial spark” to “production-ready asset.”
Check out the demo: https://devpost.com/software/genesis-spzbu2
That keyhole analogy is spot on. Node-based workflows really change how you think about iteration and control.
Absolutely! I know they are intimidating at first but they really unlocked things for me in a way that was missing. I need to SEE things connected. I need to see the flow.
Exactly. Once you can see the system, decisions stop feeling isolated. Flow visibility changes everything — iteration, debugging, even creativity.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
My new Illustration for Vibe Coding issues from developers and non developers and what happened for high security risk and not mature infrastructure to scale the app.
Vibe coding looks easy… until your app breaks. 😅
“Just tell AI what you want and it will build it.”
Sounds great.
Until you spend credits asking it to fix the same bug 10 different ways.
Then another feature breaks.
You fix that one.
Something else stops working.
Then you're staring at the same error for hours thinking:
“Why is this still happening?”
That's the part people don't show you about vibe coding.
AI can write code incredibly fast, but fast code doesn't automatically mean good code.
You still need to understand:
→ How the application is structured
→ Where the bug is actually coming from
→ How different features affect each other
→ When an AI-generated solution is making things worse
→ How to debug instead of blindly regenerating code
And sometimes the biggest time killer isn't building a feature.
It's getting stuck on one tiny bug that refuses to die.
That's why I don't see vibe coding as:
“Tell AI what to build.”
I see it as:
Human problem-solving + AI development.
The AI can help you move faster.
But you still need someone who knows where to go when things stop working.
That's where the real skill comes in.
What has been your biggest headache with vibe coding? 👇
— Optimum Studio
the same bug fixed 10 different ways is painfully accurate lol
Luna UI 2.0 is live
a design studio for startups in Framer
calculate your project cost in seconds, browse website templates, discover the studio vision, and step into a journal split into two interactive worlds
go in ↓
https://lunaui.co