The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
You can usually tell how a product was built by how it feels.
Some feel heavy too many steps, too many decisions, too many things trying to happen at once.
Others feel… obvious. Like there was never another way to do it.
That difference isn’t talent. It’s restraint.
Knowing what to build is important.
Knowing what to ignore is where most of the value is created.
I’ve been spending more time lately simplifying systems, removing layers, and making products feel the way they should’ve from the start.
It’s interesting how often the real solution is less, not more.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Consistency means every touchpoint feels like it belongs to the same brand. Uniformity means every touchpoint looks identical. The first builds trust. The second kills flexibility.
Your shot is exceptional. I'm overwhelmed with the quality of work!
Someone asked for a tool like yours on Reddit an hour ago. Did you see it?
Riffle finds buying conversations so you can be the answer.
Waitlist open: rifflehq.com
Nice design
What do you think of when you say, “this design doesn't feel premium”?
I've heard this kind of feedback from clients countless times. You know that “premium” can mean different things depending on the person, the product, and what they are comparing it against.
Recently, though, I found myself on the other side of a very similar conversation.
We've been developing a brand identity for one of our own projects, and I caught myself giving exactly the kind of feedback I've spent years receiving from clients.
“This doesn't feel right.”
“This isn't quite what I had in mind.”
There was a very specific image in my head. I just didn't have a neat explanation for it.
I was comparing what I was seeing against a pre-existing perception of what the brand should be. The gap was obvious to me because I could see both things at once: the design in front of me and the image in my head.
And that made me think back to all those conversations about making something feel more like “premium”, or trustworthy, sophisticated, playful, serious, whatever the brief happens to call for.
A client may have a very specific perception in mind that doesn't necessarily match what a designer would know to associate with that quality. They may be comparing the design against something the designer can't see yet.
The designer is checking against something too: years of seeing how visual choices, combinations and conventions tend to communicate, plus the context of the product, audience and brand.
The client is checking against the idea in their head. They may not always be able to articulate it, but they can still tell when what they're seeing doesn't match it.
So what are you actually checking against when you decide a design feels premium?
To me this would mean one thing - there was no strategic work done before touching visuals. Hence it's shooting in the dark and trying to magically match the client taste.
Strategy makes decisions informed, and put both parties on the same page way before the design work starts.