The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Running 10-step AI agent loops on heavy LLMs like GPT 5.6 Terra or Claude Opus 5 gets expensive—and painfully slow—very fast.
When building real-time production agentic systems (like an event-driven Gmail automation and a multimodal AI food tracker), the biggest challenge wasn't writing prompt templates. It was surviving cost and latency constraints.
Here is the 4-layer architecture I implemented to optimize performance and budget:
Layer 1 (Heuristics & Cache): Offloading 80% of classification tasks to fast local fuzzy search and Redis cache before hitting any LLM.
Layer 2 (Ultra-Fast Compute): Using Google's Gemini 3.6 Flash as a dedicated function-calling engine for high-frequency agentic loops, bringing tool-calling latency down to near-search speed.
Layer 3 (Heavy Reasoning): Reserving frontier models (Gemini 3.1 Pro / Claude Opus 5) strictly for complex edge cases behind an automated LLM Circuit Breaker.
Layer 4 (Resilience): Implementing infinite loop guards and strict state tracking over real-time webhooks.
The Impact:
• Cut routine LLM API token costs by roughly 80% in production.
• Sub-second response times for multi-step tool calls.
• Zero infinite event loop crashes under high load.
The counterintuitive part: 80% of the AI optimization had nothing to do with LLMs—it was classic backend engineering (caching, state tracking, and circuit breakers).
How do you manage LLM costs and latency in your client projects?
Full case studies: G-Mind (Gmail engine) and OptiFood AI (nutrition tracker) on my profile.
#AI #AgenticAI #Backend #Python #Automation
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Trending
Claude
Claude has entered the design space. How are you using it?
Contra University
Learn from expert creatives how to earn more using next-gen AI tools.
Brand Design
The best brand designers are on Contra. Scroll to see what's trending in brand design. What are you building?
creativeaiflow
Creative AI workflows are evolving. What tools do you use, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
freelancerlife
Freelancer life is wins, pivots, and everything in between. What’s yours right now?
Related posts
Many businesses want to build AI agents and automated workflows, but they face challenges with unreliable outputs, complex AI logic, poor data validation, and systems that are difficult to maintain in production. Without structured workflows and strong type safety, AI applications can become unpredictable, expensive, and difficult to scale.
I will build type-safe, production-ready AI workflows using Pydantic AI, AutoGen, and modern agent development frameworks. I create reliable AI systems with structured outputs, intelligent agent collaboration, tool integrations, validation layers, and scalable automation pipelines.
I use powerful AI development tools including Pydantic AI, AutoGen, Agno, CrewAI, LangChain, LlamaIndex, Semantic Kernel, Haystack, OpenAI API, and Anthropic Claude API to design and deploy advanced AI workflows.
My process includes AI architecture design, agent workflow development, structured data validation, API integrations, tool calling, memory management, testing, debugging, and deployment. Whether you need AI agents, multi-agent systems, RAG pipelines, enterprise automation, or custom LLM workflows, I will help you build reliable AI solutions that are secure, maintainable, and ready for real-world production use.
GoHighLevel Lead Follow-Up Workflow for an Oregon Construction Company
I built this GoHighLevel Connect Call workflow to help an Oregon construction company manage new inquiries from Networx, Google Ads, and other lead sources.
The workflow maps the different paths a lead can take, including successful contact, missed calls, continued follow-up, and human handoff. It also keeps the relevant tasks, contact updates, and next steps organized inside the CRM.
The goal was to create a consistent lead-management process without relying on scattered notes or manual reminders.
Good automation does not replace the sales conversation. It makes sure the right conversation happens at the right time.
I help service businesses with GoHighLevel workflow design, CRM organization, lead routing, follow-up automation, and system audits.
For a construction company specifically, that missed call path is probably doing more revenue recovery than any other branch. guys on a job site are not picking up mid pour so leads default to voicemail & just go cold without something automatically pulling them back in
Hype, hype and hype... It's the first page of the notebook that I write in tells me.
I was building automated workflows around Signalwatch, and it got me thinking about all the hype.
Hype around just one piece of the puzzle, LLMs. They just predict the next word while generating... No magic.The better they are trained, the better the output. Super helpful in a lot of contexts...
Tool calling. Helpful, but if LangChain and RAG + LLMs, for example, are not included where appropriate, ta ta, bye bye.
Automation. Someone bringing me a glass of water, for example, isn't something to be automated or waste resources or tokens on...
This brings me back to structural understanding, especially python + machine learning basics where you train a model based on a small piece of dataset you download from hugging face, for example... a lot becomes clear here
