The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
A client says:
“We want an AI chatbot on our website.”
Most people immediately start thinking about models, APIs, RAG, or pricing.
But before writing a single line of code, there is one question tha matters more:
What would you ask the client first?
Not the tech stack.
Not the budget.
Not the model.
The question that would help you understand whether they actually need an AI chatbot at all.
Drop your answer below 👇
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Trending
retrofuturism
Share your favorite designs from the past exploring the distant future. Or your own take on the aesthetic 🚀
halftone
Dots. Texture. Grain. Let's see your designs using the halftone technique.
Midjourney
Creatives are showing off what they're making with Midjourney.
colorgrade
Video editors sound off: How do you enhance the mood of your video in color grading?
Related posts
AI tools don’t always understand design the same way.
Some are really good at creating beautiful, spacious and aesthetically pleasing interfaces.
Others focus more on functionality, user flow and UX — even if the final interface doesn’t look as polished.
And that is why you need to understand the strengths of your AI tools and direct them accordingly.
For this design, I tested Claude, ChatGPT, and Figma Make.
Now I want to know which one was the best.
Pick your winner 👇
Figma make is better visual🔥
AI HAS STARTED A LAYOFF RACE (pt. 2)
But it is not firing everyone.
It is making it harder for new people to get hired.
Yesterday, I wrote about a paper that describes an AI-driven layoff race.
So what does the real market look like?
Not mass unemployment.
Not yet.
But something quieter is already happening.
"Block" just cut more than 4,000 people — from over 10,000 to under 6,000.
This was not a company collapsing.
"Block" had a strong year. Profits were growing.
The bet was simple: a smaller team with AI can do more.
That is the shift.
It does not start with firing an entire profession overnight.
It starts with not replacing the person who leaves.
With fewer junior roles. Fewer assistants. Fewer entry-level tasks. Fewer simple freelance projects.
The first thing that disappears is not the job.
It is the first rung of the ladder.
Yes, AI is already everywhere at work. In the U.S., 55% of workers say they use it for at least one task.
But using AI to write an email is not the same as a company rebuilding itself around AI.
Only 18% of U.S. firms formally use AI in a business function. And among those, most use it to help people do their work — not to cut jobs.
So we are not at “AI replaced everyone.”
We are at: “the same amount of office work, with fewer new people coming in.”
And there is an early warning sign.
A U.S. Census working paper found a 12% decline in employment among 22–24-year-olds in the most AI-exposed parts of the economy over 10 quarters after ChatGPT launched.
The authors are careful: COVID, remote work, and education may also be part of the story.
But the pattern matters.
Companies may not fire every senior employee.
They may simply stop giving beginners their first chance.
You can keep your job — and still watch the ladder behind you lose its first steps.
Freelancers: are you seeing fewer small projects? Or clients expecting one person to do the work of three?
Next: “Oh, my dear investors — look, I’m AI-native!”
Clean interface and advanced chatbot for your service, claim yours.:
This is Great