Building software with AI requires more than a good prompt.
I've been developing my own Autonomous Engineering Harness to structure how I build software with AI.
The idea is simple: instead of relying on AI to generate code one task at a time, I wanted a more structured process that connects specifications, task planning, implementation, code review, and QA.
The harness organizes the workflow into clear stages:
- Specifications: define what needs to be built.
- Task planning: break requirements into manageable units.
I'd carry acceptance criteria from the spec into QA as explicit checks, with a result attached to each one. When the spec changes mid-build, does the workflow flag which completed tasks and QA results need to be revisited?
Proud to officially add the AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer - Associate certification to my toolkit!
Building robust machine learning pipelines and scaling AI workloads securely on the cloud has always been a key focus of mine. Earning this certification has been a great deep-dive into mastering AWS ML infrastructure, MLOps best practices, and production-grade architectures.
Ready to bring these advanced capabilities to upcoming data science and engineering projects! Let's build something impactful. 💡💪
Congratulations on earning the AWS Machine Learning Engineer certification, Hazem khaled! Robust pipelines and cloud automation make all the difference for production-grade AI systems.