The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
A professionally structured scientific literature review demonstrating the ability to identify relevant research, evaluate published evidence, synthesise scientific findings and communicate complex information in a clear academic format.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
Designed an AI research workspace where the agent plans the work and fills a sheet with cited sources as it goes.
Same screen, two modes. Which one would you work in all day? 👀
13 voted
72%
5 voted
28%
18 votes
Closed
Keeping the research plan and cited results side by side is a useful way to make the agent’s work easier to inspect. I’d lean toward light mode for reading the table in daylight. How do you distinguish a verified source from one that still needs review?
A beautiful landing page is great. A clear landing page is even better.
The real magic happens when both work together.
Here's the submission review screen we made for Coursewell. The student's work sits next to the rubric, and the grade goes in on the same screen.
Coursewell is now on Figma Community: https://www.figma.com/community/file/1696934146588062044