The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
A landing page can look perfect on desktop and still leak mobile conversions.
Before shipping, test these five things at 320, 375 and 414 px:
No horizontal scroll or clipped copy.
The primary CTA is visible and readable without hunting.
Tap targets are at least 44 × 44 px and are not crowded.
Form labels, error states and keyboard focus still work.
Hero images do not push the first useful action below the fold.
A quick rule: every mobile defect should include the viewport, a screenshot, expected behaviour and priority. “Looks broken” is not actionable QA.
I have turned this into a fixed-scope audit: annotated screenshots, prioritized fixes and one retest. $59 for one landing page, delivered within five business days:
https://contra.com/s/rMYEsYFv-mobile-landing-page-qa-audit
AI-assisted checks; every finding is reviewed before delivery.
contra.com
Mobile Landing Page QA Audit by Kai Relaunch Dept
Read more about Mobile Landing Page QA Audit by Kai Relaunch Dept on Contra.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Trending
Claude
Claude has entered the design space. How are you using it?
Contra University
Learn from expert creatives how to earn more using next-gen AI tools.
Brand Design
The best brand designers are on Contra. Scroll to see what's trending in brand design. What are you building?
creativeaiflow
Creative AI workflows are evolving. What tools do you use, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
freelancerlife
Freelancer life is wins, pivots, and everything in between. What’s yours right now?
Related posts
Veranda, a luxury residential concept landing page
Veranda is a concept build I created for a fictional luxury residential brand. It is not client work or a real property. The images and hero motion were generated with AI as part of the creative process.
I wanted to explore something that matters when building high-fidelity landing pages: after several rounds of changes, how do you make sure the final page still looks like the design that was approved?
The site is built in Next.js with responsive layouts, self-hosted fonts, GSAP motion and an interactive walkthrough. I also built in a proper QA process around it, not just checking that the page loads and the buttons work.
It compares 12 sections across five screen sizes against approved visual baselines. It flags visual drift, missing baselines and changes that have not been reviewed. I also tested interactions, accessibility, contrast, performance, browser behaviour and reduced-motion states.
The main lesson for me was simple: a page can pass functional tests and still no longer be the page that was agreed.
Building a QA process that flags visual drift against approved baselines is such an underrated skill, most people just eyeball it after changes go in. What first made you start checking for that instead of trusting the build looked right?
Why connect Claude to Base44 when it has perfect AI on its own?
Another Framer hero section wrapped up.
It's always satisfying seeing a concept come to life.
I'm currently taking on a few new Framer web development projects for August 2026.
If you've been thinking about launching a new site or giving your current one a fresh look, I'd love to help.
Perfecto
