Sample report (demo, not commissioned by any client): desk research shortlist of 7 footwear manufacturers in Hai Phong, Vietnam. Every fact has a public source and date; outdated or unreachable records are flagged. Vietnamese summary included.
Keeping the research plan and cited results side by side is a useful way to make the agent’s work easier to inspect. I’d lean toward light mode for reading the table in daylight. How do you distinguish a verified source from one that still needs review?