AI can write the code. But who decides what should actually be built?
While building with AI coding agents, I kept running into the same problem: unclear requirements turned into assumptions about features, dependencies, and architecture.
Then came the extra iterations to undo decisions I never intended to make.
That’s why I’m building Archseed—a CLI that helps define the project before handing it to a coding agent.
The idea is simple:
→ Define what V1 needs to deliver.
→ Make “not building this yet” explicit.
→ Set technical boundaries.
→ Give your agent a clear project context.
It doesn’t write your application or replace your coding tool. It helps you give that tool a clearer starting point.
Less “build me everything.”
More “here’s the outcome, here are the boundaries.”
What’s one assumption an AI coding agent made that you wish it had asked you about first?
This is for all of us building with Ai…
Stop asking AI to "make it look pretty" and expecting a miracle. You’re just going to get the same boring layout as 500 other companies.
Watch this before you build another piece of AI slop
Don’t say i didn’t do anything for you 🌝🤲🏽… And yesss, I was shouting because the Ai design slop is too much😂
🌙 3:07 AM. Your team is asleep. Your AI agents aren't. 🤖
While you sleep, they:
💬 Reply to every new lead in seconds
📅 Book the slot straight into your calendar
🔔 Follow up before the lead goes cold
📊 Have your morning summary ready
☀️ You wake up to bookings, not missed messages.
🚀 I build AI agents for startups and small businesses.
🎁 Message me for a free of cost demo on your own services and prices 👋