The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
One thing I’ve learned from stepping into stalled software projects: the code usually isn’t the first problem.
More often, no one is quite sure what “done” means anymore. Priorities have shifted, decisions are scattered across meetings and messages, and the next step depends on five other unanswered questions.
That’s why my first move is usually to make the work understandable again: what exists, what matters now, what’s blocking progress, and what we can realistically finish next.
Once that’s clear, the technical work gets a lot less painful.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
A little throwback to a Webflow project from last year!
The client already had a design they liked, so instead of starting over, we focused on giving it a fresh look and bringing everything to life in Webflow.
Sometimes it's more about improving what's already there than reinventing everything.
Curious how you guys approach projects like this. Do you prefer starting fresh or building on an existing design?
More of my work: https://www.offmade.studio/
Smooth experience!
Simple copy doesn't mean your product is simple. It means your explanation is doing its job.
Let's be honest: some products are genuinely complex. Some may involve technical features, integrations, automation, data, and processes that aren't always easy to explain.
But here's the thing: your audience shouldn't need a technical background just to understand why your product is useful.
Take this example:
Technical explanation:
"Our platform uses API integrations and automated data synchronization to consolidate information across multiple business applications."
For a layperson this may sound like a big, structured nothing. One thing that I learned while bartending is that your client should only know the necessary.
Why give a technical explanation to someone looking for a solution? Always be careful to not throw too much information at the client.
Now, with that in mind, let's make it clearer:
"Connect your business tools and keep your data updated automatically, all in one place."
See the difference?
The second version is easier to understand, but it still communicates what the feature does. It doesn't remove the technical value; it makes that value easier to grasp.
That's what effective SaaS copywriting should do: translate technical features into clear, meaningful explanations without sacrificing accuracy.
It's about knowing what information matters, what your audience needs to understand, and how to communicate it without unnecessary complexity.
Clarity isn't the enemy of technical detail. It's what makes technical detail useful.
What's harder in your experience: understanding a complex product or explaining it in simple terms?
That's the point of copywriting: to make it simple. At least, this is one point of copywriting.
How do you turn a complex software solution into a story people can easily understand?
