The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
A damaged-order request should not become an automatic promise.
In this OpsPilot demo, five damaged units and a requested Friday deadline become a structured request and an editable response.
The workflow pauses for a person to review the facts. I edit the reply, approve it, and the same execution resumes—with the decision recorded in the audit trail.
Independent portfolio demo using fictional data and a fallback AI provider. All external actions are simulated; no messages are sent.
Which would you require a person to confirm before replying: replacement availability, the delivery date, or both?
Explore the demo: https://opspilot.159-89-22-244.sslip.io/
I'd confirm both before promising a replacement by Friday, and keep the customer's requested date separate from the confirmed delivery date. If stock is available but shipping isn't confirmed, the draft should acknowledge the request and say delivery is still being checked.
Thanks, Kapil. That distinction is important: the customer’s requested date shouldn’t become a confirmed commitment. I’d make stock availability and delivery confirmation explicit in the review screen, while allowing an acknowledgement when shipping is still being checked. Useful feedback for the next iteration.
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
🚀 Built a Gmail AI-Tagging + Slack Alerts System — Because Important Emails Should Never Get Missed
The problem every B2B team faces:
❌ Client emails sit unanswered for days
❌ Bank or government emails get buried in the inbox
❌ Deadlines are missed because no one flags them
❌ No daily view of what's pending vs overdue
I built a system that fixes all of this:
🎯 WHAT IT DOES:
✅ Watches Gmail inbox every 5 minutes
✅ Uses AI to classify every email into 5 categories:
• URGENT (deadlines, overdue, time-sensitive)
• BANK_GOV (banks, .gov domains, tax authorities)
• CLIENT_ACTION (awaiting response)
• FOLLOW_UP (needs follow-up)
• FYI (informational)
✅ Pushes real-time Slack alerts to the right channel:
• #urgent — for time-sensitive items
• #finance-legal — for bank/gov emails
• Assignee DM — for client action items
✅ Sends a daily 8 AM digest with:
• Overdue items
• Awaiting client action
• Pending tasks
✅ Auto-applies Gmail labels (AI/Urgent, AI/Bank-Gov, etc.)
✅ Hourly overdue scanner with automatic escalation
⚙️ TECH STACK:
n8n | Gmail API | OpenAI GPT-4o-mini | Slack API | Google Sheets
📊 RESULT:
→ Zero missed urgent emails
→ 15+ minutes saved per team member per day
→ Complete audit trail in Google Sheets
→ Full visibility into what's stuck and where
Gmail stays the primary interface. Slack becomes the reminder layer that ensures nothing slips.
Want this deployed for your team? Let's talk.
#AIAutomation #GmailAutomation #SlackIntegration #n8n #B2BSaaS #Productivity #WorkflowAutomation
Splitting BANK_GOV out on its own is smart. Those are the emails that hurt most when they get buried. When GPT-4o-mini tags one wrong, does the corrected label feed back into the prompt, or is it fixed by hand?
AI Agent Automation & Intelligent Workflow System
Building a smart AI agent powered by advanced AI models and workflow automation.
Integrating webhooks, AI memory, conditional routing, and automated responses.
Designed for customer support, product recommendations, and intelligent task handling.
Creating scalable, efficient, and business-focused AI automation solutions.
Designed & Developed by Shubham Tripathi.
I really found this so amazing personally