The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Today I'm sharing LifeOS, the product I've always wished existed.
LifeOS is an AI powered Personal Operating System that acts as your digital twin, bringing together your health, sleep, finances, goals, habits, learning, reading, travel, spirituality, journal, and AI coaching into one intelligent ecosystem.
Instead of juggling dozens of disconnected apps, LifeOS continuously learns from your activities, surfaces meaningful insights, predicts challenges before they happen, and helps you make better decisions every day.
For this prototype, I focused on designing a futuristic, highly interactive experience that feels alive. Every screen is part of one connected design system with rich motion, contextual AI, interactive dashboards, biometric authentication, dynamic widgets, animated charts, adaptive layouts, and seamless navigation. The goal was to create something that feels like the next generation of personal computing rather than another productivity app.
I built this prototype entirely in Flowstep, iterating on the user experience, information architecture, design system, and interactions until it felt like a product that could realistically launch.
Highlights:
• AI powered Digital Twin
• Biometric authentication with Face ID, Fingerprint and Passkeys
• Dynamic, customizable dashboard
• AI Coach integrated throughout the experience
• Health, Finance, Nutrition, Sleep, Learning, Reading, Prayer, Travel and Goals in one ecosystem
• Interactive charts, maps, timelines and widgets
• Production quality multi screen prototype
• Consistent futuristic design system with rich micro interactions
What I learned:
Designing LifeOS reinforced the idea that the future isn't more apps. It's one intelligent operating system that understands the whole person and proactively helps them live better.
#FlowstepChallenge @flowstep_ai #AI #UXDesign #UIDesign #ProductDesign #DesignEngineering #Prototype #FutureOfWork #ArtificialIntelligence #InteractionDesign #Innovation
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Challenges
View all
Related posts
A little interactive experiment for Verdant 🌱
Writing unique code for animations makes iterating on reactive micro-interactions so much smoother. It completely transforms how a brand narrative feels in the browser.
Great job
AI based memory rewinder app. Which design is better as Homescreen?
7 voted
88%
1 voted
12%
8 votes
Closed
The mood-capture direction feels more distinctive to me—the layered cards give the memory context real personality. I’d keep the summary drawer as a quick-glance fallback for returning users.
At CRITER.AI, we’re building AI that helps migrants avoid expensive legal mistakes and visa bans by auditing Australian visa applications against immigration law. We’ve been getting a healthy amount of investor interest, but there was one recurring piece of feedback: our pitch deck was lackluster.
Fair enough. As a lawyer, my creativity usually goes into finding the legal issue everyone else missed, not deciding which shade of blue says “invest now.”
So we set out to change that. We chose Contra over its competitors because the caliber of people looked considerably stronger.
When I posted our request for a pitch-deck redesign, I expected a few people to reach out with quotes. As of today, we have had 303 applicants.
For a bootstrapped business, working through that volume was simply impossible. So we created a challenge:
“Here is my pitch deck. Pick the slide you think needs the most work, and show me what you can do.”
What followed was fascinating.
101 applicants (around 1/3) never replied. Of those who did, around 10% simply reiterated what they had already said. One person replied that, with 250 applicants, they were not going to bother trying. lol.
Several asked whether the test would be paid. 12 sent a quote for the work to be paid first, after which I could decide whether to go further.
Less than 25% of the applications were obviously AI-generated. We are by no means AI-phobic, but the Claude watermark was perhaps a little too much. You know who you are dude!
2 people had trouble opening the Google file we sent. I’m still not entirely sure why.
7 people were so impressed by the work they did that they watermarked it, labelled it “draft,” or otherwise made it impossible to download for further review.
12 people reached out through LinkedIn rather than the app; a further 18 emailed; and 1 person even called me.
18 people not only sent an example slide; they also signed up for our free immigration-advice beta test.
From 303 applicants, we narrowed the field to 15 people who were simply too good to ignore.
Every one of those candidates took the time to understand what we were trying to do, what CRITER.AI is about, and spoke to us as people rather than as another job listing. Two spotted mistakes in the pitch deck that we would not have noticed without them. Another created a 3-minute Loom presentation explaining the changes they made and why they mattered. Most went beyond the requested single slide. One applicant redesigned the entire pitch deck and sent it watermark-free.
It was a difficult decision, but the person we chose had just that little bit more talent than an exceptionally strong group. They not only showed that they understood what we wanted and impressed us with the slide they redesigned; they also suggested another slide we had never considered relevant, then created it using information we had not even provided.
They took our AI immigration-law business and made our pitch deck speak to investors on a human level.
Can't wait to come back to resign our website, social media and other design work.
Lovely and impressive!