Your Business Doesn't Need More Tools. It Needs Better Systems.

Most businesses don't have a software problem. They have an integration problem.

Their CRM is disconnected from their database. Their spreadsheets require manual updates. Their reports take hours to prepare. Their teams waste valuable time moving information between platforms.

That's where I come in.

I'm a Full-Stack AI Engineer specializing in building connected, intelligent business systems.

What I can build for your business:

CRM & ERP Integrations — Connect business platforms, databases, and third-party services through APIs.

Workflow Automation — Eliminate repetitive processes with intelligent automation.

Custom Dashboards — Turn scattered business data into actionable insights.

Data Pipelines — Build reliable systems for collecting, processing, validating, and synchronizing data.

AI-Powered Solutions — Integrate LLMs, intelligent agents, and automation into existing workflows.

Custom Software — Build complete web applications and business platforms from architecture to deployment.

I've independently developed complex digital platforms, including government-level systems, international applications, and AI-powered products.

My approach is simple:

Understand the business problem. Design the right architecture. Build the complete solution. Make it reliable.

I'm interested in working with founders, agencies, and businesses looking to modernize their operations and build software that actually solves problems.

Have a complex workflow or an integration challenge? Let's build something that works.

#FullStackDevelopment #AIAutomation #CRMIntegration #WorkflowAutomation #SoftwareEngineering #AIEngineering #Contra

When a CRM-to-database sync fails halfway, how do you handle it: idempotent retries, or a reconciliation pass afterward? That's usually where integrations start to drift.

I’ve been working on a small skill called Manual Orchestrator to make longer projects with AI agents easier to manage.

The problem started with a familiar situation: one chat would accumulate plans, implementation details, corrections, and test results. By the time I was ready for the next phase, I wanted a fresh conversation without losing the decisions we’d already made.

Manual Orchestrator gives that process some structure. One chat acts as the orchestrator: it breaks the work into stages and writes a prompt for the next one. I run that prompt in a new session, then bring the result back. The orchestrator reviews it against the stage’s criteria before preparing the next prompt. If something needs fixing, I go back to the same worker session.

The skill also keeps a record in the project with the current stage, decisions, evidence, and next steps. That makes it easier to pause, resume, or hand the work to another session.

The handoff is manual. I choose when to open a session and carry the result back. The orchestrator and worker sessions can also use different agent CLIs, with the prompt adapted to the capabilities available.

It’s open source and still a work in progress. I’m using it to learn what helps in practice and where the workflow needs to improve. Installation has been checked for Codex, Claude Code, and Gemini CLI, but the full workflow hasn’t been tested across every CLI or version.

If you try it, I’d be interested in hearing what works and where it gets in your way.

I like that the handoff is manual. A written record with decisions and next steps is what I miss most when a long AI chat gets messy. How do you decide when a stage is finished: with tests, or with your own review?