Switching a client site to automatic production deploys is rarely a decision anyone made. It was the platform default, left on, then defended later as philosophy. What it saves is a click and the awkward message asking a client to open the preview URL again. Both land on the developer. What it costs is the publish decision, handed to whoever merges next, with whatever the branch holds. On a product team that's fine. On client work the merger owns the code and the client owns the brand. Every host ships the fix. Netlify locks the published deploy. Vercel stages the push once you turn off auto-assigned production domains. Actions uses environment protection rules when the approver shouldn't be the author. If your live deploy turned out to be wrong right now, could you name the deploy ID you'd roll back to? https://www.duskolicanin.com/blog/manual-production-deploy-client-websites

Spot on! Automatic production deploys can save time, but manual control gives peace of mind—especially when dealing with client projects

Semipresencial Ânima — Lead generation landing page for Ânima Educação A high-conversion landing page for Ânima Educação, one of Brazil's largest education groups, presenting its blended learning model and capturing leads for new enrollments.

The challenge was to explain a complex educational model in a simple way, in a highly competitive market. The design follows Ânima's visual identity to convey trust, with a clear information hierarchy and strategic calls to action.

Built for performance: SEO structure for education searches, form integration with the CRM and a fully responsive layout.