Car interfaces keep gaining features, but experience gets lost in complexity. With River, we stripped that back: only surface what the driver needs, when the...
Making the tool instead of just using it is such an underrated superpower for designers. Once you can generate directions to react to, exploration stops feeling precious and starts being fun. This is the good kind of lazy.
The visual identity is starting to take shape, so I wanted to see how the logo could behave once it moves.
I explored two directions.
Option 1 is sharper and more engineered. Angular fragments build the mark, a controlled energy pulse moves across the frame, and the wordmark reveals with a more technical, performance-led feel.
Option 2 is quieter. Smaller movements, cleaner reveals, fewer elements, and a much more minimal sense of precision.
Same identity, two very different personalities.
I’m leaning toward one already, but curious which direction feels more YONU to you.
Exploring how the YONU mark behaves in motion while the identity is still developing makes sense. Are these intended for a short logo sting or a longer brand sequence?