I've recently worked on a new landing page design for one of my clients which would have taken me...

I've recently worked on a new landing page design for one of my clients which would have taken me...I've recently worked on a new landing page design for one of my clients which would have taken me...

The network for creativity

Join 1.25M professional creatives like you

Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free

Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started

Back to feedPost

Tony Goff-Yu

• Aug 3

I've recently worked on a new landing page design for one of my clients which would have taken me about an hour to design in Figma but took Claude about 5 minutes...but then took me about 5 hours to get it to where I would have got it to in an hour 😆

However, the advantage you have is that it's built and you can deploy it, so it really depends on the requirements for the brief.

Claude

Jock Oosterveer

• Oct 20

A creative technologist takes an idea and works out what technology can do for it. Then builds the way it gets made, so it works a second time too.

That's the short version, as a 39-second pixel film. I'm the one with the hat.

In my own work it goes two ways. Creative workflows make the work: the images, clips and films. Operational ones keep it running, like the setup behind a team using AI every day. For both, the loop is the same: test it, break it, build it better.

The voice in the film is a synthetic version of mine. The animation is drawn in code.

Claude Pixel Art html

Sagar Nawaz

• Oct 21

Love this definition! "Works a second time too" is the real difference between a cool experiment and actual creative technology. Building the system so it repeats is where the craft is. That 39-second pixel film sounds fun - love that you put yourself in it with the hat! 😄