Building a platform that covers scheduling, customer records, communication, and appointment booking means designing across very different use cases. The risk is that each use case starts pulling in its own direction and the product ends up feeling fragmented.

We established a consistent way to use components early and applied it at two levels.

1/ At the page level, consistent text sizes and layout logic.

2/ At the component level, the interaction patterns show whether you are filtering technicians, service types, or job durations.

The result is a system where you don't need many text sizes, components, or colors because everything follows a coherent logic.

The filter panel is one example of that direction.

Exploring 3D interactions and brutalist scale for Kinetix — a portfolio concept centered on design systems and digital products.

Focused on balancing heavy typography with fluid, tactile motion so the 3D element feels integrated rather than decorative.

Curious to hear your thoughts: does the 3D rotating showcase feel smooth and intuitive, or do you prefer flat, high-speed interactions for portfolio heroes?

The rotating 3D works here precisely because you kept it integrated, not decorative, so it reads as intent rather than showing off. For a portfolio hero I usually lean flat and fast, but this earns the motion. That heavy Kinetix wordmark has real physical weight.