The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
Most designers spend 80% of their time on the wrong screens. Here is which ones actually matter.
Early in my career I did the same thing.
Spent days perfecting the settings page. The profile section. The help center. Screens that look good in a portfolio but rarely decide whether a user stays or leaves.
After 150+ products here is what I know for sure.
These are the screens that actually matter.
The first screen after sign up. This is where most products lose users forever. If someone does not understand what to do in the first 60 seconds, they are gone. Design this one like your product depends on it. Because it does.
The empty state. What does the product look like before the user has done anything? Most teams skip this. The best products use it to guide, reassure, and motivate.
The error state. Users will hit errors. What they see in that moment decides whether they try again or close the tab. A cold error message kills trust instantly.
The upgrade or conversion screen. If you are building SaaS, this screen is revenue. Every word, every layout choice, every CTA placement is a business decision.
The dashboard on day one vs day thirty. They should feel different. New users need guidance. Returning users need speed. Most products design one and call it done.
The homepage gets all the attention. These five screens get all the results.
Which one does your product need the most work on?
#uiux #productdesign #saasdesign #uxdesign #figma #uidesigner #designprocess #startupdesign #aidesign #freelancedesigner
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Challenges
View all
Related posts
Client’s choice vs. Designer’s choice 👀
I’m currently working on a branding project for Massage & Mocktails — a concept built around couples learning massage together in a relaxed, social atmosphere.
These are two early, black & white directions from Stage 2 of my branding process, before moving into color, typography, and the full visual system.
The interesting part?
My client chose Concept 1. I chose Concept 2.
Now I’m curious what other creatives think.
Which direction would you choose — 1 or 2? And why?
Sometimes the most interesting part of branding is seeing how differently a client and a designer respond to the same brief.
21 voted
44%
27 voted
56%
48 votes
Closed
Concept 2 for me. That interlocking figure mark reads as two people meeting, which is the actual brief here, so it gives you more to build a system on. Concept 1 is the safer, more literal pick, which is usually why clients reach for it.
HOW MUCH GUIDANCE DOES A PASSWORD FIELD NEED?
For this desktop sign-up screen, I explored two ways to guide users while creating a password:
A - Detailed. A checklist displays every requirement and updates as the user types.
B - Minimal. A strength indicator provides quick feedback while keeping the interface cleaner.
The checklist offers more clarity, while the strength bar reduces visual noise.
Which approach would you choose - A or B?
39 voted
66%
20 voted
34%
59 votes
Closed
Detailed layout entails a guide to help users create strong passwords. Not everyone is good at crafting passwords, and this approach can makes them find it easy to remember.
Which cover gets your vote? 👀
I’m finally sharing this case study and I’m stuck between these two.
1 or 2? Which one would you click first? 👇
14 voted
34%
27 voted
66%
41 votes
Closed
