The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Back to feedPost
AI isn't replacing Web Developers. It's empowering them.
AI can generate code, layouts, and content in seconds but building fast, secure, scalable, and user-friendly websites still requires human expertise.
you agree?
The network for creativity
Join 1.25M professional creatives like you
Connect with clients, get discovered, and run your business 100% commission-free
Creatives on Contra have earned over $150M and we are just getting started
Related posts
My submission for the Wonder Challenge is live ✨
I created my personal portfolio website with Wonder — from prompt-based design exploration to a complete Marmel portfolio experience.
Wonder helped me build the design foundation quickly, Claude helped bring it into code.
Live portfolio:
Web site live
Don’t forget to leave me a message in the Playground section. I’d love to read it.
Great
I got tired of two things: the nightly "what should I watch?" paralysis across a dozen streaming apps, and rating systems where a single score doesn't really tell you enough about a film.
So I built Quartile (quartilefilm.io), a film discovery and rating platform. The core idea: instead of one ambiguous score, every film is broken into the five elements that actually matter — Plot, Acting (Narration for docs), Cinematography, Novelty, and Ending — each scored on a 1–4 scale: Well Below Average, Below Average, Above Average, Well Above Average. There's deliberately no neutral "average" middle — it forces you to actually take a position on each category instead of lazily defaulting everything to the middle, which keeps the ratings honest.
Those five combine into a consistent score out of 10, but you can also see what each category scored, which helps you understand why a film is rated what it is. Sometimes a movie is really good but the ending or the acting is terrible, so the overall score isn't that high — and without the Quartile system you'd have no way to know that, because a single number can't tell you. That's exactly why I built it: I wanted to know why a film was rated what it was. Essentially it's a formula and some real quality control for how a film gets rated.
The coolest part is it lets you filter in really cool ways. You can filter by Top in any category — so Top Cinematography shows only films rated Well Above Average (4) there. Top Novelty is one of my favorites, and one of the most unique filters we offer. You can also stack these with genre — so Top Novelty in horror, or Top Cinematography in sci-fi — which is where it gets genuinely useful for finding something specific to your mood.
On top of the rating system you can log films you've seen, build and share playlists, and follow other users to see what they're watching. The same way you follow friends with good taste in music to find new songs on Spotify, film is a matter of taste too — you can follow friends with good taste in certain genres to find movies you'll actually like.
It's in beta right now. Would love feedback from this crowd and general thoughts. Of course I'd be stoked if you made a profile and started rating movies and building playlists too — I'm going to grandfather in the first active users and give them something really cool on their profile eventually to mark that they were one of the first Quartile users.
How do the five categories mathematically combine into the final score out of 10. Is it a straight average, or are certain elements weighted higher?
This is the most expensive mistake for tech startups right now, and nobody's talking about it.
Your landing page has two visitors now.
One is human.
One is an agent, quietly reading your site's structure before any human sees it.
This isn't a slow trend. It happened in the last few months, and most B2B startups haven't caught up.
Agents don't decide like people do.
They research, compare, and shortlist vendors before a human looks at anything.
The agent reads your site.
Decides if you're credible. Tells the human what to trust.
If that agent can't parse your site, it doesn't reject you.
It just doesn't mention you in the shortlist it hands back.
The real challenge for founders right now isn't a redesign that looks better.
It's a redesign that works equally well for humans and agents.
Trending
Claude
Claude has entered the design space. How are you using Claude Design?
Contra University
Learn from expert creatives how to earn more using next-gen AI tools.
fifaworldcup2026
The World Cup is here and the whole world's watching. How are you designing for the world stage?
creativeaiflow
Creative AI workflows are evolving. What tools do you use, and what are their strengths and weaknesses?
freelancerlife
Freelancer life is wins, pivots, and everything in between. What’s yours right now?