Summary

FAQs

• You're not a technologist. How do you write authoritatively about tech topics?

  My expertise lies in analyzing technology's human impact, not its engineering. With a background in communications and systems thinking, I specialize in translating complex tech concepts into clear, compelling narratives about their societal, ethical, and personal consequences—which is often what readers and organizations care about most.

• How do you handle the expert interviews if we opt for that add-on?

  I handle the full process: identifying suitable experts, scheduling interviews, preparing questions, and synthesizing their insights into the narrative. You'll receive a smooth, turn-key service, and I always share direct quotes with you for approval before publication to ensure accuracy and alignment.

• How do you balance depth with accessibility for a non-technical audience?

  It's my core skill. I avoid jargon and use analogies and storytelling to explain technical foundations, but never 'dumb down' the concepts. The focus remains on the 'so what?'—the ethical dilemmas, societal shifts, and human experiences—ensuring the piece is both intellectually substantial and widely engaging.

• What does 'investigative/reflective' mean in your deliverables?

  It means the piece is built on thorough research (studies, reports, credible analysis) and moves beyond mere explanation to explore implications. It 'investigates' the topic's roots and effects, then 'reflects' on its meaning, inviting readers to consider their relationship with the technology and its future impact on our world."

• What if we need changes after the first round of revisions?

  The included round covers refining arguments, clarity, and tone based on your feedback. If subsequent requests arise from new directions or significant restructuring beyond that scope, we would discuss a small additional fee to ensure the piece receives the dedicated time it deserves to meet your new goals."