I help EdTech teams investigate whether their AI writing scores and feedback are supported by the learner's actual response.

If your product evaluates English writing, a plausible score is only the beginning. The feedback must follow the rubric, identify real evidence and help the learner improve. I examine those connections through a focused, documented quality audit.

30 unique synthetic test cases selected for your agreed writing workflow.

50 planned system executions, including repeated scoring of ten cases.

A PDF findings report with priorities and practical recommendations.

An evidence workbook linking observations to inputs, outputs and criteria.

Acceptance tests your team can use when checking fixes.

A 45-minute walkthrough of the findings.

One consolidated clarification or report-correction round, requested within seven calendar days of delivery.

Task relevance, rubric alignment, scoring consistency, feedback accuracy, unsupported claims and controlled response variations. Each finding connects the learner evidence to the AI judgement, explains the possible consequence and sets out a retest.

We agree the feature, supported task types, rubric, configuration and evaluation questions.

I review the selected cases and freeze specialist reference judgements before reviewing the AI outputs.

I execute the planned tests and preserve the evidence, or review complete client-provided outputs under an agreed export protocol.

You receive the report, workbook and a walkthrough of the priorities.

Your product link, authorised test access or agreed output exports, sufficient test credits, the applicable rubric and score scale, the target learner profile, and one project contact.

Delivery: 10 business days from the agreed start date, after scope, access and required information are confirmed. Platform charges and third-party testing costs are separate from the USD 950 service fee.

I am Suliman Abdelaty, FHEA, FRSA, an English Language Assessment and AI Quality Specialist with 12+ years of experience in English education and assessment. My background includes assessment development for an international EdTech project and published research on language-assessment reliability. I deliver the review personally.

The launch fee covers one English writing feature, one agreed rubric and one frozen configuration. The audit supplies specialist diagnostic evidence within that scope. It does not certify a product or establish population validity or inter-rater reliability. Audio, pronunciation, clinical content, software implementation and formal psychometric studies require a separate proposal.

Send me your product link, the writing feature you want reviewed and the rubric through Contra. I will confirm the scope and an available start date.