I audit your Figma design system the way a maintainer would (token bindings, variant coverage, contrast, naming an agent can parse), then rebuild the loose parts and sync the result to code: tokens, rules, and structure that coding agents follow instead of drifting from.

Coding agents are probably already building your UI. Left alone with a loose system, an agent invents its own components and hardcodes what it can't find, and a few sprints later the design file and the product no longer describe the same thing. More review meetings don't fix that; a system agents can read does.

Audit Your Figma system read the way a maintainer would: token bindings, variant coverage, contrast, detached instances, and whether the naming parses for an agent at all. You get a written report with a fix-first list, plus the fixed quote for the rest.

Foundations Variables with scopes and code syntax, typography and spacing as tokens rather than habits, semantic names through the whole file.

Components Variant sets with bound properties and structured descriptions, built to be read by designers and agents at the same time.

Sync to code Tokens delivered as CSS custom properties or a DESIGN.md your repo's agents load, with written rules that keep generated screens on-system.

What this isn't A rebrand, a purchased UI kit with your logo on it, or a promise that agents stop needing review. A good system narrows what can go wrong; your team still owns taste.

A short call, then the paid part starts with the $500 audit.

Foundations and components land in your Figma file with bindings in place, and the sync to code goes last, written for the agents your team actually runs.

You see the system grow in your own file, not in a deck about it.

Good timing When your team starts building with coding agents in earnest, or after the first sprint where the design file and the shipped screens stopped matching.