I perform independent technical audits and hand back a written report: exact file and line findings, severity, correct-versus-incorrect reasoning, and concrete fixes.

I focus on correctness bugs, concurrency and thread-safety issues, performance and memory hotspots, and security gaps (secret handling, input validation, dependency risk).

I do this routinely, including literature-grounded audits of my own systems that surfaced numerical, concurrency, and cache-invalidation bugs across thousands of lines. I have also worked inside a SOC 2 fintech environment, so I treat security review as a discipline, not a checkbox.

Deliverable: a clear, prioritized report you can act on, and optionally the fixes applied and verified.

- Correctness and logic bugs, with reproducible failure cases

- Concurrency and thread-safety

- Performance and memory profiling

- Security: secrets, input validation, authorization, dependency exposure

- Architecture and maintainability

Ideal for: teams shipping something important who want a second, adversarial set of eyes before launch, or after an AI-assisted build.