Agent QA and Eval Harness That Proves Your Bot Actually Works by Stone RossAgent QA and Eval Harness That Proves Your Bot Actually Works by Stone Ross
Agent QA and Eval Harness That Proves Your Bot Actually WorksStone Ross
Cover image for Agent QA and Eval Harness That Proves Your Bot Actually Works
Somebody sold you an agent. It demos beautifully. You still do not know whether it works on a Tuesday when a caller says something nobody scripted.
I know that feeling from the other side. I ran a services company to $649,206 with 25 remote workers, & the thing that actually cost me money was never the build. It was finding out from a customer that the build had broken.
So I stopped arguing about quality & started measuring it.
I write your edge cases as scenarios & run them against your live agent. Each one comes back pass or fail. Not a note, not an opinion, a result you can check.
What you get
A scenario suite written from your real call & chat logs
Adversarial cases, the ones people avoid writing because they fail
An LLM judge scoring tone, accuracy & whether it actually resolved
A pass or fail report per scenario, with the transcript attached
The harness itself, yours to keep & re-run on every deploy
On my own platform the unqualified-lead gate passes 4 of 4 & the abuse hard-stops pass 3 of 3. The AI CRO suite runs 12 of 12. Those are checked on every deploy, which is the only reason I trust them.
I will test an agent I did not build. Most of this work is exactly that.
If everything comes back green, you get a clean report & I say so. No upsell.
Starting at$950
Duration1 week
Tags
AI Automation
Automation Engineer
Service provided by
Stone Ross Kennett Square, USA
Agent QA and Eval Harness That Proves Your Bot Actually WorksStone Ross
Starting at$950
Duration1 week
Tags
AI Automation
Automation Engineer
Cover image for Agent QA and Eval Harness That Proves Your Bot Actually Works
Somebody sold you an agent. It demos beautifully. You still do not know whether it works on a Tuesday when a caller says something nobody scripted.
I know that feeling from the other side. I ran a services company to $649,206 with 25 remote workers, & the thing that actually cost me money was never the build. It was finding out from a customer that the build had broken.
So I stopped arguing about quality & started measuring it.
I write your edge cases as scenarios & run them against your live agent. Each one comes back pass or fail. Not a note, not an opinion, a result you can check.
What you get
A scenario suite written from your real call & chat logs
Adversarial cases, the ones people avoid writing because they fail
An LLM judge scoring tone, accuracy & whether it actually resolved
A pass or fail report per scenario, with the transcript attached
The harness itself, yours to keep & re-run on every deploy
On my own platform the unqualified-lead gate passes 4 of 4 & the abuse hard-stops pass 3 of 3. The AI CRO suite runs 12 of 12. Those are checked on every deploy, which is the only reason I trust them.
I will test an agent I did not build. Most of this work is exactly that.
If everything comes back green, you get a clean report & I say so. No upsell.
$950